Re: packs and trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/20/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The plan is to modify rcs2git from parsecvs to create all of the git
objects for the tree.

Sounds like a good plan. Have you seen recent discussions about it
being impossible to repack usefully when you don't have trees (and
resulting performance problems on ext3).

cvs2svn seems to do a good job at generating the trees.

No doubt. Gut the last stage, and use all the data in the intermediate
DBs to run a git import. It's a great plan, and if you can understand
that Python code... all yours ;-)

exactly sure how the changeset detection algorithms in the three apps
compare, but cvs2svn is not having any trouble building changesets for
Mozilla. The other two apps have some issues, cvsps throws away some
of the branches and parsecvs can't complete the analysis.

Have you tried a recent parsecvs from Keith's tree? There's been quite
a bit of activity there too. And Keith's interested in sorting out
incremental imports too, which you need for a reasonable Moz
transition plan as well.

cheers,



martin
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]