On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:58:30AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:42:40PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > As for now, I fail to see why the current system is not adequate for git!
> >
> > I can reassure you, gazillions of people still fail to see why cvs is
> > not adequate for their project. And the ratio of devs in the
> > corporate world not knowning git to those not knowning cvs is far
> > superior to 2. And everyone here knows cvs is not more adequate than
> > git for so many tasks :)
>
> You know as well as I that this comparison is unfair. I am _NOT_ a
> corporate person. I hope that you do not judge me as a complete airhead.
Well, I have to apologize - especially after looking closer at the
current Makefile. I think I understand now why autoconf was suggested
in the first place, but it what it would achieve would mostly moving
the ifdef's to configure.ac, which would not be such a gain anyway.
Best regards,
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Debian-related: <dirson@xxxxxxxxxx> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html