Re: Autoconf/Automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Phil Richards wrote:

> On 2006-06-15, Alex Riesen <fork0@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >  Git already has enough external dependencies (crypto, Python, Perl,
> >  bash, gmake), why create another one?
> > 
> >  If we are about to need a configuration system (and I doubt it), may
> >  be we should at least select a system small enough to have it always
> >  in git repo? (yes, as linux kernel configuration system is)
> 
> Well, since Python is already a dependency, why not use a build system
> that has Python as its scripting/extension language?  It's also quite
> small, and it's called SCons.  I found it rather easy to learn
> when I was having a quick look around at alternative build systems.

Okay, let's face it. There are gazillions of make clones which "guarantee" 
to fix all shortcomings of make. None of them are even close to make 
(regarding developer exposure: take 3 developers, and 1 does not know 
make, and 2 do not know whatever-your-favourite-make-clone-is).

As for now, I fail to see why the current system is not adequate for git!

Ciao,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]