Re: Unresolved issues #2 (shallow clone again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/7/06, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For linux v2.6.16:

7,3M commits-b41b04a36afebdba3b70b74f419fc7d97249bd7f.pack
 24M commits_trees-8397f1c2a885527acd07e2caa8c95df626451493.pack
 97M full-c7b2747a674ff55cb4a59dabebe419f191e360df.pack

With this pack arrangement, do you get any noticeable difference in
walking commits? How about walking commits+trees with git-log <path> ?

I wonder whether segregating packs by object type would make things better...

cheers,



martin
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]