Linus Torvalds wrote: > So what you'd get is a _really_ cut down history that doesn't contain any > commit history at all (just distinct "points in commit history time"), but > that _does_ contain all the objects that the commits point to. So we would get 'skin-deep clone' rather than 'shallow' one? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html