Re: RFC: New diff-delta.c implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Geert Bosch <bosch@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> That's about how I implemented it in my last patch.
> Is it correct that 0 means that there is no max_size?
> Should I set *delta_size to 0 when doing an early
> return, or leave it alone?

When failing, I think
the convention is to return NULL and what you do with *delta_size
does not matter, but Nico and pack-objects.c code can answer
that better than I can ;-).

> Note that this really is a micro-optimization,

True.  max_size is a hint, and the caller validates the size
independently anyway, so ignoring is fine.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]