Re: n-heads and patch dependency chains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 06:47, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

> No, I mean that this would commit both to the testing branch (being the 
> result of several merged topic-branches) and to the topic-branch merged 
> in. Commit as in regular commit, with a commit-message and a patch. The 
> resulting repository would be the exact same as if the change was 
> committed only to the topic-branch and then cherry-picked on to the 
> testing-branch.

I am your number one fan!  If I finish reading these 600+
messages, will I find out you have already implemented it,
it's committed, and you just need me to test it now? :-)

jdl


-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]