Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Wouldn't "git commit -M -b topic", for committing to a different branch > than what is checked out (-b) and also to the checked out branch (-M) > have the same beneficial effects, but without the complexity of hydras > and patch dependency theory? It would only remove the cherry-pick stage > though, but perhaps it's good enough. Although when I think about it, -b > <branch> for committing to another branch and -B <branch> for doing the > above probably makes more sense. Do you mean that you commit current state to the checked out (working) branch, and commit *changes* (i.e. apply patch) to a different branch? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html