Re: HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:10:57PM CEST, I got a letter
where Nick Hengeveld <nickh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said that...
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> > Well, what is the actual advantage of DAV compared to
> > git-update-server-info? Why would I prefer enabling DAV?
> 
> In theory, things should work the same either way.  It seems that in
> practice though, the server info files continue to surface as a source
> of fetch problems.

Because people do not know they have to set up their post-update hook.
When they are already going at lengths to find out how to set up DAV for
git fetch, they would discover the post-update hook way as well.

So, it really seems rather redundant to me.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time.  I think
I have forgotten this before.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]