Re: HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:09:30PM CEST, I got a letter
where Nick Hengeveld <nickh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said that...
> Long term, this could give a repo admin the choice of either making sure
> git-update-server-info has been run after every ref/pack change or
> enabling DAV once.  Assuming they need to use HTTP.

Well, what is the actual advantage of DAV compared to
git-update-server-info? Why would I prefer enabling DAV?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time.  I think
I have forgotten this before.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]