Re: git-status too verbose?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:22:28 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> What I want to know is "what is committed", and "what is not".

Agreed. Me too.

> That table makes it really really hard to see what you are committing, if 
> you have a hundred files changed that are _not_ being committed. The 
> actual committed information will be interspersed in the files you're not 
> interested in, and vice versa.

The current sorting and grouping should not be changed.

I just want to be able to know if I'm looking at a section of
"committed" vs. "not committed" files when the headers have scrolled
off.

I think it's really just that one bit of information needed. Maybe a
'*' before the word 'modified' (or 'M' or whatever)?

-Carl

Attachment: pgpVWlF1ekD9G.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]