On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > > > I agree that it would be useful if we had a tool that showed the > > two status that matter for each file, grouped together on one > > line, e.g. > > > > HEAD->index index->files > > ------------------------------------------------ > > hello.c unmodified modified > > world.c modified unmodified > > frotz.c new unmodified > > ... > > garbage.c~ ??? n/a > > > > for the current index file and the current HEAD commit. > > > > Could we have 'same' or some such instead of 'unmodified'? It's a bit close to > 'modified' for the eye to find it quickly. I really _really_ hate that table anyway. What I want to know is "what is committed", and "what is not". That table makes it really really hard to see what you are committing, if you have a hundred files changed that are _not_ being committed. The actual committed information will be interspersed in the files you're not interested in, and vice versa. The current commit message is a million times superior, even if it might not be as _pretty_. Linus - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html