Re: Fwd: Fwd: Gimp Registry Future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle <iluetkeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> It varies a bit, of course, but 10 is a good ballpark figure, when counting
> both plugins and scripts.
>

In that case, if the intention is to focus on the scripts/plugins more than
anything else, then I feel this might be a reasonable number for a small
team to handle manually.


> However... We get about one user registered every five minutes. That is,
> between 200 and 300 users a day. And those are the *successful*
> registrations, i.e., those that pass the text analysis and the captcha.
>
>
This seems to be the root of the spam problem - would we need to have user
accounts in the future?  If we move forward for integration, I think
curated content with no user accounts might be a better option?  (Not sure
here, just getting ideas on paper)


> The forum functionality would be stripped, as I am told that there are
> other good venues for such things.
>
> That said, we should be aware of the fact that commenting on plugins was
> sort of an accident (Drupal has comments on anything by default), but
> proved unexpectedly popular. I guess having both the plugin download and a
> feedback function in the same place was fairly compelling. A replacement
> should take that into account, and offers an easily accessible feedback
> method that redirects people to the appropriate place.
>

Again, this appears to really be the root of the problem.  We could
certainly try allowing comments again on whatever new system (or mod of the
old) occurs.


> Well... Yes, I agree, but that's a bit besides the point. This is not about
> replacing the back-end. We can replace the back-end at our leisure, of
> course, if people want that, but its working right now.
>
> I am talking about replacing the *front-end*, to integrate things more
> tightly with the gimp, and improve the user experience. This was a request
> that Michael Schumacher made, for example, and that others have also made
> in the past.
>

I agree that this would be fantastic - integration would certainly be a
fantastic path moving forward!  It would just make sense to clean house
overall first to make sure everything was solid before attempting to hook
into GIMP in this fashion (plus - Alexandre makes a good point about
support across all the OS's/bit-depths.

Perhaps a first attempt should be to look at scripts, as they are usually
able to run across OS's without a problem (at least script-fu)?


-- 
pat david
http://blog.patdavid.net
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list





[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux