On 12/04/2013 05:27 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On 4 December 2013 19:50, Teo Mazars <mazarst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This Gaussian blur slider range doesn't really allow slider selection
of
small, precise values less than 1, so typing in values is still
necessary. A logarithm-type scale might be better than a linear scale
as
the useful range for blur necessarily is large, and the larger the
image, the larger the useful range.
[...]
The other gegl_chant_double_ui values are pretty obvious. What does
the
value "1.5" do?
The "1.5" is the UI exponent you were asking for in Gaussian Blur, 1.0 is linear. If 1.5 is not enough, you may try 2.0 or larger. For the slider step problem, I don't know much about that sorry... I think the new UI values you suggest are good. So please, try some more by tweaking the exponent and you can commit directly to GEGL master those changes, if you want.
OK, that would explain why lowering that value to below 1 made the
slider act strangely. I'll do some more experimenting and submit a
patch. In the meantime, anyone have an idea of the largest GB and USM
values they actually have used for image editing?
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
