On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So unless you come up with a real usability study within our target user >> group that shows that they can't handle this change we won't change >> this. > > Or, you can do what I've done-- build Gimp 2.6 and not take upgrades. Or, like I've done - install both ;) Sometimes when I *know* it's just going to be a one-shot operation and I don't give a damn about the source file*, I'll right-click and open in 2.6 instead of 2.8. The downside of this is that I'm having to remember both behaviors. But I'm getting used to it and will probably stick with 2.8 only when next I upgrade my OS. Chris * for example: crappy JPEG, crop to some text, maybe chop letters apart, convert to grayscale, levels, save as PNG, upload to WTF font identifier. If disk space weren't cheap, I'd delete both the source and destination afterward: they are of no further use. In 2.8 I close without saving. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
