On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > No, they aren't: I'm not proposing to remove or change the current > behaviour. I'm proposing to add a configuration option (I don't care how > hard it is to find) to re-enable the old behaviour. I also find the change frustrating for my workflow. I don't mind learning the export-instead-of-save command, but it's bad UI to always confirm on exit even after a file is saved -- and, for many actual real world user workflows, exported *is* saved for every practical purpose. I understand that having a lot of options in a user interface is generally frowned upon, but this isn't a UI choice -- it's a workflow choice. This is explained in more detail at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687783 > I really hope we can solve this upstream; otherwise I'll have to create > a variant of GIMP and publish it into an Ubuntu PPA, which will be > rather sad because it will be a feature accessible only by those using > Ubuntu (I certainly don't have the energy to create a proper fork and > maintain it). It seems likely to be popular, and I think since the core developers here are pretty much set against the idea, it's probably more constructive than arguing. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
