On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is analogous to saying "don't use emacs just to do a quick edit; > use vi for that". Different tools have different interfaces, and I > don't want to learn two different interfaces to edit images just because > I want to "quick and dirty". I take beef with this comparsion. its more like comparing GIMP and PS. fair compare would be nano vs emacs. And if its available, I use nano to edit a single line in a small conf file. If I want syntax higlight and all the fancyness of emacs, I fire it up. And I do not complayn that I have to press a few more keys to save and exit than in nano if I do. -- --Alexia _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
