On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some options have high cost and only benefit an obscure case. In *this* > case, the cost is relatively small (one option which is a refinement of an > option that's always been there) and the *reward for the project* is high. The issue is conceptual. You do not need to fire up the giant machine that is gimp to this little thing... GIMP is not a tool for this usecase. It is capable of doing it, but it will not be perfectly convenient. You can use a scalpel to cut bread. It will do the job, but it would be done better and faster with a bread knife. However you would not want this person cutting into your body with a breadknife, simply because it's unsafe. You try to make GIMP into a breadknife so you can more comfortably cut bread where as its intended purpose is to be a scalpel, a tool for thins where unsafe operations are a no-go.... --Alexia _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
