Re: What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Switching to new build system should not be linked to the fact that the former does not work, but to the best that the new works.

Qt is a great library. Yes is C++ but dosen't require rewriting GIMP but only the user interface. But as already said I shot too high :-)

Il giorno 29/lug/2012 16:03, "Isaac Wagner" <isaacbwagner@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
Autotools may be unpleasant to learn, but once it works, it works, and it works well for GIMP. If you were starting a new project then you might have grounds to think about picking an easier build tool, but why throw away all the work already put into GIMP's use of autotools because autotools is too confusing for you? You likely aren't going to be doing any huge modifications on the autotools files yourself, so why not let the people who know how to use it use what they like?

P.S. Qt is a miserable library, and it's C++. Switching to it would essentially require a complete rewrite of GIMP and wouldn't really improve anything in the end.

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Partha Bagchi <partha1b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Partha Bagchi wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Jernej Simončič <jernej@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sunday, July 29, 2012, 13:55:48, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>>>
>>>> CMake can generate GNU make-compatible makefiles just fine, so unless
>>>> you meant
>>>> GNU Automake, that's not the issue. CMake can also generate project
>>>> files for
>>>> other IDEs and support some other build-systems, all from the same
>>>> sources, so
>>>> in this respect it is far superior to GNU Autohell.
>>>
>>>
>>> How well does CMake handle cross-compiling? I recently had to compile
>>> a few projects that didn't use autotools, and getting them to
>>> cross-compile wasn't fun (one of those made some very wrong
>>> assumptions about Windows as well, which didn't help either).
>>>
>> Exactly!! I for one definitely vote against such a change assuming my
>> vote counts. :)
>
>
> Just chipping in with some actual information: cmake does support
> cross-compiling quite well. See
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling.
>
> Boudewijn
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
>

In the past I have found it to be way too much work for too little
gain and hence don't wish to use it on Windows.
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list


_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux