On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Malix wrote: > I already know that this post will generate a lot of flames. But you do it anyway? > Next step of the project is the porting of the code to Gtk 3 It started over a year ago, it's just lower priority right now. > why instead not switching away from gtk and go with Qt? Because developers prefer GTK+? Because GTK+ was born from GIMP, so there's a bond between the two projects? > And also leave autohell and switch to make? What is make, please? Are you referring to CMake maybe? :) Personally I don't mind it. Would you like to provide a patch? > You can think that I'm just kidding but consider those two blog post No, you are "merely" suggesting to scrap a lot of work on GTK3 port that's already done. > http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2012/07/23/self-congratulating-echo-chamber/ I think you really intended to link to http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2012/07/27/staring-into-the-abyss/ instead. There are some good points and some horrible points there. You do not explain however, what is it exactly that made you link to this blog posting. > http://blog.mardy.it/2012/05/from-g-to-q.html?m=1 Sorry, but sending people to a wall of text is not very helpful. You'll have to explain what you were meant to say with this link :) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
