On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:16 PM, gg wrote: > It seems the "target user" argument is often cited here but they still need > to be prevented form doing something "unsafe". > > do professional top end uses really need idiot proof software? Was it a deliberate attempt to spill some oil into the fire? Thank you for that. We are all extremely interested in another shout contest. > Given the functionality and a GUI that is not obstructive to the job in > hand, I don't think many of the target audience will be shooting ourselves > in the foot. _Our_selves? > And if that happens I expect they would be suitably embarrassed and adult > enough not to blame it on gimp. Yes, I think _you_ would expect that. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list