On 06/16/12 19:58, Jon Nordby wrote:
One
can in general not revive dead peop^Wdocuments.
Which is why the don't give guns to children but top-end can be trusted
to understand that jpeg is lossy and png does not store layers.
It seems the "target user" argument is often cited here but they still
need to be prevented form doing something "unsafe".
do professional top end uses really need idiot proof software?
Given the functionality and a GUI that is not obstructive to the job in
hand, I don't think many of the target audience will be shooting
ourselves in the foot.
And if that happens I expect they would be suitably embarrassed and
adult enough not to blame it on gimp.
/gg
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
