first, thanks to Guillermo for the insight and the encouraging words.
then, Alexandre wrote:
> "has to be easy to review and apply by the maintainer(s);" -- let's
> just call it Git formatted and made against a rebased clone of the
> master branch, shall we?
actually that sentence about "easy to review and apply by the
maintainer(s)" was said exactly like that in the bof at lgm.
so I thought I included it, there must be an open source point in it.
the whole git business is of course a very detailed implementation
of that.
> On the whole, I agree with this first stab and would like to move this
> description (once finished) to wiki.gimp.org :)
be my guest. you can even add the git bit.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
