On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM, peter sikking <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > guys, > > lately I have been thinking about introducing a new process. > > this thinking has been accelerated by the GIMP bof at the lgm, > where GIMP project members expressed concern about lack of > openness and transparency in the current UI redesign work, and > I expressed concern about lack of valuation and respect for > the field of interaction design. > > the discussion at lgm was constructive, and I think that > everybody should just act to address all of the concerns. > > I think that the new process that I am thinking about can > contribute to that. > > this process is an ‘interaction design patch/contribution’ for new, > fresh contributors, that I want to model it one-to-one on the established > code patch/contribution process (for new, fresh contributors). > > so first we need a good description of this code contribution process, > before adapting it. > > I have given it a first stab: > > <http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Interaction_design_patch> > > I like to discuss it here on this mailing list and get it > in a shape that is beyond reasonable doubt. after that the > next steps can be taken. "has to be easy to review and apply by the maintainer(s);" -- let's just call it Git formatted and made against a rebased clone of the master branch, shall we? On the whole, I agree with this first stab and would like to move this description (once finished) to wiki.gimp.org :) Let's see how interaction design part evolves. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
