On 03/18/2011 04:03 AM, Michael Natterer wrote: > > Generally, I rather like to have more than less bugs on a milestone, > because there is nothing more frustrating than a huge list of > bugs with milestone "---". It looks as if we simply don't care at all. > For a bug reporter,it would be frustrating to have a bug accepted with milestone X only to have it then pushed out to X+2 or later. But I agree that for everyone else, the milestone indication helps acknowledging that the bug is recognized as real and there is an intend to fix. Both as a developer and a user I like Bugzilla and the information it gives me; the more information it provides, the better. If there are many bugs with a 2.8 milestone, I would be more encouraged to try and help out by researching and addressing some of them. Eric _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
