On 03/15/2011 06:38 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >>> Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind >>> putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the >>> milestones is supposed to mean. The prerequisite is in place, making >>> the messages translatable is very little work. So why are we going to >>> ship 2.8 with the horrible mix of English/localized UI once again? >> >> There are thousands of other small things we could spend time on rather >> than working on the highest prioritized features dictated by our >> roadmap. But if we do, it might very well go another 9 years without >> any support for high bit depths in GIMP. > > It looks like you didn't even bother looking at the bug report in question. > > Right now all it takes is green lights for someone (e.g. me) to enable > the messages for translation and then let translators do their work. > > With all respect due, what 9 years are you talking about? I did look at it, and I saw that mitch said there was a problem, then you said there wasn't a problem, and now developer needs to verify that there maybe isn't a problem. It is harder to ignore small things like this, but they add up, and as I said: we need to stop working on what is not important and not be trapped in working on things like this. I was referring to the age of "Bug 74224 - Add support for 16 bits per channel"... / Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Why GIMP 2.8 is not released yet" _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
