On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind >> putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the >> milestones is supposed to mean. The prerequisite is in place, making >> the messages translatable is very little work. So why are we going to >> ship 2.8 with the horrible mix of English/localized UI once again? > > There are thousands of other small things we could spend time on rather > than working on the highest prioritized features dictated by our > roadmap. But if we do, it might very well go another 9 years without > any support for high bit depths in GIMP. It looks like you didn't even bother looking at the bug report in question. Right now all it takes is green lights for someone (e.g. me) to enable the messages for translation and then let translators do their work. With all respect due, what 9 years are you talking about? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
