On 03/15/2011 10:44 AM, Jon Nordby wrote: > On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts<enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a >> regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting >> languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without layer >> groups support in Python, but the alternative is worse: not releasing >> GIMP 2.8 at all. And we should arrange for the Python bindings to be >> automatically generated from the PDB rather than wasting man-weeks on >> manually keeping it up to date. Not an easy task perhaps, but the only >> sensible one. >> > Long term, bindings should of course be generated (or rather be > dynamic using pygobject, when/if possible). > However I need layer groups exposed for the Python API in order to > support layer groups in OpenRaster, so I will probably do these > bindings for 2.8. Just need to find the time. Do we have a bug open > about this issue? Take a look at Bug 624303 - Introduce an item class in PyGIMP https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624303 / Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Why GIMP 2.8 is not released yet" _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
