On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a > regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting > languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without layer > groups support in Python, but the alternative is worse: not releasing > GIMP 2.8 at all. And we should arrange for the Python bindings to be > automatically generated from the PDB rather than wasting man-weeks on > manually keeping it up to date. Not an easy task perhaps, but the only > sensible one. > Long term, bindings should of course be generated (or rather be dynamic using pygobject, when/if possible). However I need layer groups exposed for the Python API in order to support layer groups in OpenRaster, so I will probably do these bindings for 2.8. Just need to find the time. Do we have a bug open about this issue? -- Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
