On 03/03/2011 07:21 AM, Bill Skaggs wrote: > Let me start by noting that although I was once pretty familiar with the > Gimp code, I haven't > looked at it in a couple of years. That being said, this discussion is > not making sense to > me. Plug-ins do not access Gimp core functionality directly, they use > an interface library > known as "libgimp". Hi Bill You got it all wrong: porting GIMP plug-ins to GEGL operations is about exactly that: replacing GIMP plug-ins with GEGL operations. It is not about making libgimp GEGL-aware. Instead of http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/tree/plug-ins/common/pixelize.c we want http://git.gnome.org/browse/gegl/tree/operations/common/pixelise.c Best regards, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Why GIMP 2.8 is not released yet" _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
