Re: Ang: Why GIMP is Inadequate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, ronald.arvidsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<ronald.arvidsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >snip< I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth
> asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but
> before you get there its a VERY good thing to have. particularly for us
> who edit photos with a large dynamic range.

GIMP developers have been painfully aware that this is a serious
short-coming of the current architecture for the last decade. There is
no need to reiterate this :).

Besides what needs fixing is the 8bit per component limitation, 16
bits/component isn't how it will be fixed though. The internal
processing will jump straight to 32bit floating point allowing HDR
processing and other advantages.

/Øyvind Kolås
-- 
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
                                                 -- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ ;                           http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux