Ang: Why GIMP is Inadequate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear developers.

Firstly I would like to thank you warmly for a very good tool. I'm 
personally very happy with the user interface and don't see it inferior 
to Photoshop. I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth 
asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but 
before you get there its a VERY good thing to have. particularly for us 
who edit photos with a large dynamic range. 

Again many thanks for the good work,  I truely belive so.

Cheers

Ronald

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:39:31 +0100
From: Malix <malix0@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Why GIMP is Inadequate
To: gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinrAma_7SrHaEZ=E-JpJozrUSe77TeVf6LzH2VH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,

on this blog there is a post about Gimp that generate a lot of user 
comments.

http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html

I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post 
a replay.

Bye
Massimo


_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux