Re: Why GIMP is Inadequate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/13/2011 10:02 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 01:39 AM, Malix wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> on this blog there is a post about Gimp that generate a lot of user comments.
>>
>> http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html
>>
>> I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post a replay.
>>
>> Bye
>> Massimo
> To me, most of his criticism is legitimate. I don't agree with all of
> it, but it's not all "false". I don't see the point in treating him as
> hostile; it just help him prove his point that we can't take criticism.
>
> If we keep improving GIMP and stick to our plan, I am confident we will
> eventually address all of the shortcomings he points out.
>
>    / Martin
Thanks Martin.  That was exactly my thought.  The only way to speed this 
up is to throw more good developers at it.  I've got a little patch into 
GIMP and a little patch into gegl.  I wonder what other small thing I 
can look at to get my foot a little wetter?

Patrick
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux