Michael Schumacher wrote: > Other than that I agree, the plug-in isn't good enough for being >> included in GIMP 3.0. > What are the requirements for "good enough to be included in GIMP 3.0"? > If we don't have them yet, we really should start collecting them. > > The docs page about the plug-in suggests that the author didn't really know what's going on, but that's nothing to be ashamed of, in my opinion. > > > Michael The fact somebody do not use something is not enough to exclude that from the program. Many users do not use layer modes. So should they be abandoned? IMHO if something is not good enough for somebody it should be either improved or leaved untouched. With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
