On 11/12/2010 09:21 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > What are the requirements for "good enough to be included in GIMP 3.0"? > If we don't have them yet, we really should start collecting them. > I see only one: general usefulness. IMHO the "Filters" menu is getting a bit out of hand. There are plenty of things there that I never use (the same applies to brushes/patterns/gradients). Having the extra ones there isn't free, they get in the way of the people who don't use them (and slow down startup). I would be in favor of a more "barebones" installation, with task-oriented complements: - art (filters/artistic, filters/decor, filters/render, many brushes/patterns/gradients) - image (most of the "filters/enhance" part, "filters/photo", de-noise, de-shake, color balance) - maybe a "beginner's pack" with some of the current stuff. > The docs page about the plug-in suggests that the author didn't really know what's going on, but that's nothing to be ashamed of, in my opinion. > The hover balloon in the menu also says "Special effects that nobody understands" :-) _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
