On 08/24/2010 04:20 AM, David Gowers wrote: > I hope you're not associating the quite suboptimal way in which GIMP > currently uses GEGL, with BABL's speed or lack of speed. > Just did a quick test: 1Mio random pixels passed to babl as one buffer (=one function call) vs. passing the same buffer pixel by pixel (=1Mio calls) to the integer conversions. babl still comes out 35x slower. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
