Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, yahvuu wrote: > [...] > >> II. Range of actually useful values for IJG quality value >> >> For GIMP's target users less than half of all possible settings >> are useful: > possibly - I've often used values as low as 35% or sometimes lower. > "The sweet spot" depends hugely on your image and your purpose - > consider providing a "lowsrc" alternate image for low bandwidth > Web users for example, or a thumnail. good point -- that proves wrong my claim that there were only a handful of useful quality settings. Also, further discussion about those 5 values >95 becomes moot, i guess.. regards, yavuu _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
