On Saturday 31 October 2009, vabijou2 wrote: > Speaking again as a non-programmer, why would anything have to change > internally? Many internal names have "gimp" in them, and future generations of programmers should not have to ask themselves what that stands for when nobody knows "GIMP" anymore. So while changing names internally is not strictly required, it would be very very much recommended. Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
