On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:35 PM, vabijou2 <vabijou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lame, crippled, inept, deficient, or sexual deviant ..... > > I get that it's an acronym, but that doesn't mean it isn't incredibly > strange to want to associate a project that the developers are proud of with > any of these interpretations! You are restarting an argument that is already a decade old, and has been fought to conclusion a dozen times over. If you REALLY think it needs to be revisited, read all of the old posts and come up with a new point to make, or at least address the reasoning given repeatedly for not changing. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
