Martin Nordholts wrote: > If we define a tip shape to be a dump bitmap/vector graphics, then it > can be problematic (in terms of software maintainability and cleanness > in design) to also read dynamics data from tip shape data files. > > Everything depends on how we define the concepts. I think this is the main problem. In my opinion the "brush" should either: - Be *only* the tip shape and nothing else (leaving dynamics, brush settings, etc, to tool options, and therefore, tool presets). - Include most, if not all, tool and brush options/settings, define the tip shape, its behavior, etc, like I proposed a few weeks ago. Brush presets would work as "tool presets". Right now we have an unintuitive hybrid: some settings are defined by tool settings, some by brush settings. -- SHIRAKAWA Akira _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
