hi, Nicolas Robidoux schrieb: > I don't think that using the word "rendering" in a menu will be > self-explanatory for non-sophisticated users when used in a "save" > context. oh yes, indeed. 'Creating full resolution...' is probably less suspicious but won't solve the problem. The ugly part is that the save/render distinction shows up untimely. > I am not sure that I have a better suggestion. "Save workspace" vs > "Save image"? That is an interesting alternative. "Save workspace" is expected to be a lightweight command and addresses the problem of quickly interrupting a GIMP session. However, the save-work vs. render-image problem will show up after the command has been applied: shall all images be marked as clean although they haven't been 'fully' saved? Another alternative is to go with lazy rendering and introduce a 'finalize image' command that optionally renders to full resolution. This way, the save/render distinction won't show up until it is really desired by the user. The additional command may be required anyway as a means to reduce file size by dropping some non-destructiveness. See last image in http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.com/2009/04/version-control.html greetings, peter _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
