Ach. Sorry, but my meaning was simply that an artist can create art with any tool. mspaint was only an example. >Looks like you have to make a tough choice to stop contradicting yourself :) I wasn't contradicting myself. By "was responsible for" I meant "was used to create". It is still the artist that creates. >While it is technically possibly to create dither >patterns like this using a tool like MS-Paint (which it wasn't in this >case - it was Gimp), it is my opinion that an artist would have to >either be masochistic, have way to much time on their hands, or just >be stubbornly trying to make a point to use such a tool rather than a >more suitable one... I can do those patterns with mspaint rather easily, and I am not a masochist. --MW _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
