> Hi!There is no point in discouraging people from fixing / improving
>
> I want to mention that since we are in the progress of migrating to GEGL
> we generally prefer that people make sure the GEGL counterpart works
> well rather than maintaining the legacy 8 bpc code. A patch for GEGL is
> much more attractive than a patch for an old GIMP plug-in.
code that will be in use for at least one or two more releases,
despite all GEGL goodness.
ciao,
--mitch
OK - I'll submit the patches via bugzilla, then.
I've looked at the GEGL code now and played with it a bit, and I have to say it looks very nice and seems to be quite fast for gaussian blur and unsharp mask.
-Winston
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
