Michael Grosberg wrote: > Martin Nordholts <enselic <at> gmail.com> writes >> But to be honest I think it is best if this magazine does not write >> about what GIMP will get in 2009 simply because there is no way to make >> guarantees. If they write about it they should emphasize that everything >> is preliminary and not a promise, and that probably won't make the >> article as exciting as they want. >> >> Note that the magazine is free to do what they like though, I just >> wanted to give my thoughts on it. >> > Forgive me for the presumption but may I suggest something? instead of lowering > expectations in advance, perhaps you could do something else: use the publicity > as an opportunity for attracting new developers. You have a point. With this in mind I adjust my reply to: I here talk a little about what we would like to get into 2.8 and 2.10: http://jcornuz.wordpress.com/2008/12/27/an-exclusive-interview-with-martin-nordholts/ There is no official roadmap but that more or less summarizes what has been said in recent discussions between developers. - Martin _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
