Re: Scaling in Gimp 2.6 is much slower than in Gimp 2.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 01:44 +0100, Joern P. Meier wrote:
[...]
> By the way, what kind of downscaling is used for the view zooming?

GEGL is doing that.

I have found that for scanned engravings, where I often scale down
to 11% or smaller, that GIMP 2.6 is not only much faster, but
usually has much better results.  Sometimes I scale down
part-way with Lancsoz and then the rest of the way with cubic,
though, to minimise artefacts.  Applying a convolution filter
(a blur, in this case) before scaling down, or using Value Propagate
with "more black" (for an engraving or woodcut) can also make a really
huge improvement sometimes.

Liam


-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux