Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:52 +0100, Joern P. Meier wrote: > >> The new Gimp 2.6 "Cubic" option usually yields too bad quality to >> be considered (I won't even begin with "Linear"). > > I guess you are running into bug #556248 here (which will be 'fixed' > in 2.6.2). That may well be the case. I also noticed huge differences in quality depending on the target image size (tough I almost never scale to exactly 50%). By the way, what kind of downscaling is used for the view zooming? It is usually quite good (even with odd scaling factors). I wouldn't mind having a comparable quality in the final result. Cheers, Joern _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
