Hi, On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 17:22 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: > So far it feels noticeably slower on mediumsized or large > images (e.g. a 13899x8497-pixel 2400dpi grayscale scan, > which Gimp reports as 230MBytes) but the results are > outstandingly better. Since the test results are looking good, I think we should commit the changes then so that they get more testing. Does anyone disagree with this? Otherwise I will commit the changes later this week. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
