On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:26:59AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:14 -0700, Valerie wrote: > > > I guess we have drastically different usages of brushes though. > > I NEVER use a "brush of exactly 17 pixels". In fact, a brush of > > "exactly 17 pixels" is pretty much useless to me. Most people > > go by a visual cue instead of specific values, and you can't > > see the exact size of the brushes in the list in the first place. > > Exactly, you need a visual cue. That's why I think it's important to > offer a set of differently sized brushes in the brushes list. So that > people can pick a brush of about the right size. But perhaps we needd to > rethink the user interface for brush selection and try to come up with a > solution that works better? I have a weird obsession. I work with images that are larger than what most other people work with. So I don't need a 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, or 19 pixel fuzzy circle, but I need one that is around 30 pixels wide. Or 50. So, it's nice to have the visual cue, but because there is a simple enumeration, the one I need is never there. Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
