Hi, On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 01:05 +0100, Olof-Joachim Frahm wrote: > One thing what could be done is representing the current colormap as a > palette and therefore as a entry in the list of palettes. That would be > quite similiar to the four internal gradients, only that it requires a > bit more support (the colormap has no named entries, reflecting the > changes on the palette to the actual colormap for the image, and so on). > The colormap editor wouldn't be necessary anymore. I am not sure if merging colormaps and palettes is going to help to avoid the confusion that already exists between the two. And as far as I can see the Colormap editor has a very different use case than the Palette editor. So it seems to need a different user interface as well. Of course a lot should be similar, like how the active entry is drawn. Most of the look and feel should be common, but I'd rather keep the two dialogs seperate. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
