Hi, On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:03 +0000, Omari Stephens wrote: > It seems counterproductive that Rafael Mesquita received three separate > responses that started off pretty identically (even though they included unique > and useful information). I'd like to offer the suggestion that, when responding > to a project proposal sent to the ML, that the responder (1) acknowledge > responses sent before his own, (2) try to avoid duplicating content of the prior > responses, and (3) explicitly mention how his response differs from the ones > before it. This is unavoidable on a mailing-list. Not everyone receives the mails at the same time and there is no way you can know if anyone else has already responded to the mail. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
